Mag Reiver and a Finger

Around the time that I picked up Polly, the Thomson bobbin winder in the previous post, I also bought a Hannibal Thomson great wheel. 

It’s funny how related wheels often seem to come out of the woodwork in waves.  None in sight for years and suddenly three pop up within weeks of each other. 

This wheel was for sale in Waterboro, Maine—about sixty miles south of Turner, where Thomson made his wheels.  Just as with Thomson’s flax wheels and bobbin winders, the Shaker influence is obvious in the overall design.  

The spokes are flush with the hub, marked in place with three scribe lines

It could almost be mistaken for a Shaker wheel with its pewter collar, clean lines, and beautiful wood. 

But it has Thomson’s imprint, too, in the collar’s scallops,

his signature spokes,

The spokes don’t run down the center of the rim, but are spaced from side-to-side, presumably to angle the rim to help keep the drive band on

the fine decorative scribe lines,

and the table-top maker’s mark. 

The nail pattern on the drive wheel join is the same with this wheel and Thomson’s bobbin winder.

Great wheel nail pattern
Bobbin winder nail pattern

Over time, this wheel has acquired its own particular oddities—missing bearings, surface scratches, and a strange leg.    It’s fairly common for old great wheels to lose their hub bearings.  This one was bearing-naked front and back, leaving a gaping hole around the axle and no support for the poor drive wheel. 

The original front bearing appears to have been six-sided where it met the wooden hub, which is not unusual for this time period.  New bearings can be made from various materials, including metal and plastic, but I’m always in a hurry to see how a new wheel spins, so usually just fold some sturdy leather in there and give it a go.   The leather works great, which invariably means that I leave it in and new bearings plummet to the bottom of the wheel-repair priority list.

Without looking carefully, it’s not obvious at first that there are fine scratches over many parts of the wheel.  The close-up photos really make them apparent. 

I’m guessing that someone had a vigorous sandpaper workout on this wheel to clean it up at some point and that’s what left the scratches.  If anyone has other theories, I’d love to hear them.  I kind of like the scratches—they are subtle to the naked eye and are part of the wheel’s history—remnants of some person’s time and attention on the wheel.  I view them as fine wrinkles on a beautiful face.   

Mag Reiver on the left

The strange leg is more of a mystery.  First, a matter of terminology.  I believe it’s fairly standard to refer to the legs on the right side of wheel (facing the wheel from the spinner’s side) as the back legs.  I just don’t get that.  Since great wheels look like magnificent herd animals ready to go bounding down hill wheel first, the legs on the wheel end should be the front legs, right? 

So, since what seem to be front legs to me are back legs to most, I will refer to great wheel legs as the “uphill side” and “downhill side” legs.  With the downhill side legs on this wheel, the spinner side leg is about an inch longer than the far-side leg and it splays at a slightly different angle.   In some wheels, such leg differentials are purposeful, to make more room for the spinner to walk back and forth.  I believe that is the case here, since Thomson’s bobbin winder has a similar leg, but the difference in this case may be exaggerated due because the leg does not seem to be set properly in its hole. 

There is an unstained portion of the leg showing below the hole, which indicates that it once was more deeply set.  On the other hand, the leg hits the floor at the proper angle, the table isn’t askew, the leg is clearly a Thomson leg, and the leg is tightly wedged into its hole.  In any case, it gives the wheel a distinctive look.

The wheel has scribe marks for setting the angles of the spindle support and a peg to keep it from pulling out. Some Shaker wheels have similar marks and pegs.

In comparing this wheel to my other great wheels, the table is quite narrow—only a little over five inches wide—

and the drive wheel is high and wide of the table, especially in comparison to the Connecticut wheels (previous posts “Mercy” and “Big Bear”), where the drive wheels ride directly over the table, with little clearance. 

Despite the differences, the height of the hubs is fairly consistent with all the wheels, with only about an inch differential.    

This wheel came with an accelerated head made by Fred B. Pierce & Co.  Accelerated heads were first manufactured in the early 1800s to increase spinning efficiency and output.  

They are often referred to as “Miner’s heads,” because Amos Miner had an early patent on the design. Miner and others manufactured these wildly popular heads through the 19th century, with the Pierce family in New Hampshire dominating the market from about 1850 to 1900.   

As an example of their output, Benjamin, the father, oversaw the manufacture of more than 60,000 heads in 1865 and many heads that we find today have a Benjamin Pierce label.  Benjamin’s son Fred took over the business and the heads with his label were manufactured between 1882 and 1890.  

That means the head on this wheel is relatively new compared to most.  That may be why the corn husk bearings are still in good shape. 

As a bonus, this wheel came with a wheel finger, also sometimes called a wool finger, wheel boy, or wood peg. 

These were used to turn great wheels and bobbin winders, placing them on the spokes and giving greater reach and a break to hands, I guess, which must have gotten pretty stiff, achy, and arthritic over time. 

Some great wheels will show wear on the spokes from use of a wheel finger, but this one doesn’t.  The finger itself, however, has a good deal of wear, creating a lovely curve where it goes from the hand-holding hefty part to the narrow neck that hugs the spoke.  

This finger spent a lot of time in someone’s hand. 

For more information on Hannibal Thomson, see the previous post, “Polly,” and the references there.

My resources for information on Pierce accelerating heads:

Ramer, Alvin, “Accelerating Wheel Heads: A Comparison,” The Spinning Wheel Sleuth 54 (October 2006).

Polly and a Skarne

This attractive bobbin winder was made in Turner, Maine, by a man with the wonderful name of Hannibal Thomson.  Unraveling the who, where, and when of Thomson’s wheels illustrates why many of us are addicted to rescuing these old wheels.  There’s the thrill of the hunt—for the wheels themselves and to discover the wheel makers.  And there’s the collaboration with other antique-wheel addicts, railroading wheels to new owners, sharing knowledge and research, and getting ridiculously excited about discovering a wheel’s origins. 

My Thomson journey started at a Maine antique store, “Den of Antiquities,” where I spotted a Shaker-like flax wheel with an un-Shaker-like maker’s mark in large letters on the table.   The mark had been worn to oblivion on one end but enough was there to make out, “Thomson.” 

I knew nothing about Mr. Thomson and brought the wheel home in anticipation of a history hunt to find the maker.  I found references to three Thom(p)sons in Ravelry’s Antique Spinning Wheel group, J. Thompson, T. Thompson, and H. Thomson.  All the table stamps were in the same style, although the spelling varied.  A wheel making family, perhaps?   My wheel matched those of H. Thomson.  I had found my maker. 

H. Thomson flax wheel

Unfortunately, I couldn’t seem to discover exactly who he was.  My on-line research found many H. Thomsons who had come to Maine from Massachusetts, but I couldn’t find any references to wheel making. 

I did find, however, another H. Thomson wheel owner on Ravelry who lived not far from me in Maine. Jan had an H. Thomson bobbin winder (like the subject of this post), and flax wheel, but the drive wheel was not original.

Jan’s Thomson great wheel, and bobbin winder, reunited with my flax wheel (which I passed on to Jan)

She had been looking for an H. Thomson great wheel and when one became available at a large “wheel rescue” that I was helping with in Massachusetts, we arranged a wheel railroad. 

Flax wheel

I drove a number of wheels that Jan had been fostering down to their new owners who were also at the rescue and brought back the Thomson great wheel for Jan.  In the process, I got a chance to spin on the great wheel and it was love at first spindle click.  As with the flax wheel, the Thomson great wheel was a beautiful spinner, well- balanced and designed for effortless spinning.  I was hooked.

The maidens on the bobbin winder and flax wheel are almost identical

Some months later, a Thomson bobbin winder came up for sale in New Hampshire.  It was a long drive, so I decided to combine it with it a trip to see Craig Evans, a wheel and textile collector, historian, and weaver, who lived in the same area and was selling some of his collection. 

I picked up the bobbin winder and a large skarne that the seller desperately wanted to unload (“take it! take it!”) and headed to Craig’s.  While admiring some of his amazing collection (and picking a few things to bring home), we talked about wheels and wheel makers, including H. Thomson.  Craig recalled seeing a Thomson flax wheel in an antique store in Alfred, Maine years earlier, but didn’t know anything about Thomson himself. 

About a year later, I heard from Craig that he had discovered the identity of H. Thomson.  During that year, I had acquired a Thomson great wheel and passed my flax wheel on to Jan, to complete her Thomson collection. I excitedly contacted Jan with the news and she and Craig collaborated on a fascinating article, with Craig’s research and Jan’s wheels, titled “Hannibal Thomson and His ‘Widely Known and Sought For’ Spinning Wheels.”  The Spinning Wheel Sleuth #107, Oct. 2020.

The title quote was from a book on the history of Turner, Maine, the town where Hannibal lived and worked in the early to mid 1800s.   The description of Hannibal brings him alive: “Mr. Thompson was a good mechanic, and his spinning-wheels were widely known and sought for.  He prosecuted his business for many years, and being remarkable for ready wit, his shop was an agreeable place in which to spend a leisure hour.”  French, pp. 87-88. 

Hannibal died at age 79 in 1861, but not before seeing his wheels become obsolete: “He lived to a good old age, but in the last years there were few calls for his work, as in the change of customs, spinning-wheels, carding machines, and fulling-mill, all went down together and became things of the past.”  French, p. 88.  

What would Hannibal think if he could see how we value his work today? His wheels once again are spinning, while we marvel at his skill and thoughtful design.

Hannibal’s name in his lifetime was spelled in a variety of ways, with his last name spelled both “Thomson” and “Thompson.”  Craig found that Hannibal came from a family of wheel makers.  His great-grandfather, Archibald Thompson, emigrated with other Scots-Irish in the 1720s from Ulster, a center of Irish linen production. 

Archibald settled in North Bridgewater (now Brockton), Massachusetts, and was reputed in local histories to have made the first treadle spinning wheel in this country—or New England.  Others, however, have credited the Scots-Irish who settled in Londonderry, New Hampshire in the early 1700s with that distinction. 

In any case, Archibald’s descendants (called “his posterity” in one history) also made wheels.  Given the similarities in the style and placement of the makers’ marks, it’s likely the wheels marked “J. Thomson” and “T. Thompson” were made by family members, although that hasn’t been established yet. 

As for the winder itself, it’s a little beauty.  Its overall look is similar to Shaker wheels, which isn’t surprising because Turner, Maine is not far from the Maine Shaker colonies and Hannibal’s wheels were made in the heyday of Shaker wheel production.   The Shaker style influenced many local wheel makers.

These bobbin winders were used by weavers to fill bobbins, which were then placed on a skarne (or creel) (photos at the end of the post) for winding warps onto a warping board or reel, or directly onto a loom’s sectional beam.

The bobbins often were filled from skeins on swifts.  But, in my case, I usually tuck the winder right next to my great wheels and unwind from the wheel spindle directly onto the bobbin. 

The winder’s legs are slightly offset and the mother-of-all is angled—features that presumably make for ease of use.   

There is a similar Thomson winder in Pennington & Taylor’s book, with slightly different maidens and a spindle tip, which would allow it to be used for winding quills or even spinning. P. 29, Fig 2-33. Quills were inserted into a weaver’s shuttle, which carries the weft across the warp. This one doesn’t have a spindle tip, just a long metal rod with a whorl. 

The rod on my winder is pretty thick, so may have been rather large for quills.  Its axle is wooden, which I keep well lubricated because I use the winder all the time.  It’s a marvelous tool.

I hadn’t planned on buying a skarne when I picked up the winder, but they are very difficult to find, and the owner wanted to get rid of it.

So, home it came.

It has holes for 10 crossbars, so would hold at least 20 bobbins, more if they were smaller. Once I get additional crossbars in, I’ll put it to good use.

My resources for information on Hannibal Thomson and bobbin winders:

Cunningham, Jan and Craig Evans, “Hannibal Thomson and His ‘Widely Known and Sought For’ Spinning Wheels,”  The Spinning Wheel Sleuth 107 (October 2020).

Feldman-Wood, Florence, “Bobbin Winder Basics,” The Spinning Wheel Sleuth 36 (April 2002)

Taylor, Michael, “Londonderry, N.H. Flax Wheels, The Spinning Wheel Sleuth 48 (April 2005)

Books:

All Sorts of Good Sufficient Cloth: Linen Making in New England 1640-1860, Merrimack Valley Textile Museum, North Andover, MA 1980.

French, W.R. A History of Turner, Maine, From Settlement to 1886, Portland, ME: Hoyt, Fogg, Durham, 1887.

Pennington, David A. and Michael B. Taylor. Spinning Wheels and Accessories. Atglen, PA: Schiffer Publishing, Ltd., 2004, fig. 2-33, p. 29.